Skip to main content
· 5/1/1992

Abbs v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 963 F.2d 918
  • 1992 WL 93482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that only an en banc court, not a subsequent panel, has authority to overturn a previous panel's published decision
  • holding that only an en banc court, not a subsequent panel, has authority to overturn a previous panel’s published decision
  • treating the FRA policy statement as an exercise of statutory authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Cummings, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.