· 5/1/1992
Abbs v. Sullivan
Citations
- 963 F.2d 918
- 1992 WL 93482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that only an en banc court, not a subsequent panel, has authority to overturn a previous panel's published decision
- holding that only an en banc court, not a subsequent panel, has authority to overturn a previous panel’s published decision
- treating the FRA policy statement as an exercise of statutory authority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Cummings, Posner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.