Abbott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is insufficient to exhibit bias in the course of committing crime; rather actor must intentionally select victim because of victim’s race, creed, color or ethnicity
• explaining that it is insufficient to exhibit bias in the course of committing crime; rather actor must intentionally select victim because of victim's race, creed, color or ethnicity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Apprendi
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-06-24· cited 46×
• Freudenberger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-27· cited 5×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-04
• Major v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-16

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stalder
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-27· cited 71×
• State v. Hargrove
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-05-15· cited 52×
• Cabal v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-06-13· cited 20×
• Bisson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-03· cited 7×
• Hargrove v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-19· cited 6×
• Medberry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-03· cited 5×
• Richards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-05· cited 2×
• Woolfork v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-03· cited 2×