Abbott v. Johnstown, Gloversville & Kingsboro Horse Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \General expressions used in a statute are restricted to things and persons similar to those specifically enumerated in the language preceding the general expressions.\
• \General expressions used in a statute are restricted to things and persons similar to those specifically enumerated in the language preceding the general expressions.\ (citation omitted)
• “General expressions used in a statute are restricted to things and persons similar to those specifically enumerated in the language preceding the general expressions.”
• “General expressions used in a statute are restricted to things and persons similar to those specifically enumerated in the language preceding the general expressions.” (citation omitted)
• “The doctrine of ejusdem generis mandates that ‘[g]eneral expressions used in a statute are restricted to things and persons similar to those specifically enumerated in the language preceding the general expressions.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).