Skip to main content
· 11/20/1939

Abbott v. Coe

Citations

  • 109 F.2d 449
  • 71 App. D.C. 195
  • 43 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 267
  • 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • patent’s highly useful result of permitting operation of machine with little or no lubrication was not disclosed in patent and, therefore, not relevant to obviousness determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edgerton, Vinson, Rutledge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.