· 11/20/1939
Abbott v. Coe
Citations
- 109 F.2d 449
- 71 App. D.C. 195
- 43 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 267
- 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- patent’s highly useful result of permitting operation of machine with little or no lubrication was not disclosed in patent and, therefore, not relevant to obviousness determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edgerton, Vinson, Rutledge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.