Abbott Laboratories v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “determining the validity and meaning of a forum selection clause” requires “reference to the law of the jurisdiction whose law governs the rest of the contract”
• holding that “determining the validity and meaning of a forum selection clause” requires “reference to the law of the jurisdiction whose law governs the rest of the contract”
• stating that the law of the jurisdiction “whose law governs the rest of the contract” determines the validity of a forum selection clause
• reasoning that a similar forum-selection clause was “about as broadly worded as could be imagined”
• holding forum selection clause applying to disputes “arising from, concerning or in any way related to this Agreement” is “about as broadly worded as could be imagined”
• holding forum selection clause applying to disputes “arising from, concerning or in any way related to this Agreement” is “about as broadly worded as could be imagined”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).