Skip to main content
· 6/14/2002

Abbott Laboratories and Mitsubishi-Tokyo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Formerly Known as Tokyo Tanabe Co., Ltd.) v. Dey, L.P. And Dey, Inc.

Citations

  • 287 F.3d 1097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding applications unrelated when they had “no formal relationship and were presented to the patent office as patentably distinct inventions”
  • “The fact that a claim recites numeric ranges does not, by itself, preclude Abbott from relying on the doc trine of equivalents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Gajarsa, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.