ABBOTT LABORATORIES, AND FOURNIER INDUSTRIE ET SANTÉ AND LABORATOIRES FOURNIER S.A. v. NOVOPHARM LIMITED

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a patentee “explicitly defined” a term by using “i.e.” followed by an explanatory phrase
• holding that a patentee “explicitly defined” a term by using “i.e.” followed by the definitional phrase
• finding patentee acted as 11 own lexicographer when it “explicitly defined” claim term through use of “i.e.”
• the “all-elements rule” provides that a finding of infringement “requires a determination that every claim limitation or its equivalent can be found in the accused product”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).