Abbott Bank-Thedford v. Hanna (In re Hanna)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that although cemetery lots are unique, “as all land is unique,” the plaintiffs had failed to show that the uniqueness provided them with a competitive advantage
• “In its answer to special interrogatories, the jury found that there was no conspiracy among the defendants either to commit illegal tying (section 1) or to monopolize the installation market (section 2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).