Skip to main content
· 4/7/1992

Abbent v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Citations

  • 787 F. Supp. 229
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9313
  • 1992 WL 71199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mark “Seventh-day Adventist” was at least descriptive, with secondary meaning, or suggestive
  • “The inclusion of Eternal Gospel Church in the title Eternal Gospel Church of Seventh Day Adventists does not reduce the danger of potential confusion in light of the overwhelming similarity of the marks.”
  • “To establish secondary meaning, the owner of the mark must show that, in the minds of the public, the primary significance of a term is to identify the source of the product rather than the product itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillin, Enright, Merhige, Nangle, Pollack, Pollak, Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.