Abakar v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in interpreting an insurance contract, statutory definitions are not binding but “can serve as another extrinsic source” to help determine a term’s meaning
• court may use standard works such as dictionaries to aid interpretation of ambiguous insurance contracts
• treatment of TMJ did not come within policy exclusion for dental care and treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).