Aba, Inc. v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a plaintiff may plead unjust enrichment in the alternative” to a breach-of-contract theory unless the plaintiff fails to “challenge the validity or enforceability of the[] contract[]”
• “The D.C. Circuit has interpreted Winter to require a positive showing on all four preliminary injunction factors.” (citing Davis, 571 F.3d at 1296 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring))
• \The D.C. Circuit has interpreted Winter to require a positive showing on all four preliminary injunction factors.\ (citing Davis , 571 F.3d at 1296 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) )
• “The D.C. Circuit has interpreted Winter to require a positive showing on all four preliminary injunction factors.” (citing Davis v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 571 F.3d at 1296 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring))
• “The D.C. Circuit has interpreted Winter to require a positive showing on all four preliminary injunction factors.” (citing Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 571 F.3d 1288, 1296 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).