D.C. Circuit· 8/8/2014

Aaron Schnitzler v. United States

Citations

411 U.S. App. D.C. 412
761 F.3d 33
2014 WL 3882440
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a district court shall “construe a pro se plaintiff’s filings liberally, and . . . consider his filings as a whole before dismissing a complaint[.]”
holding a plaintiff’s “claim is not moot” where “he has not received all the 13 relief he sought”
stating that district courts have an “obligation to construe a pro se plaintiff’s filings liberally”
noting that courts may consider a pro se litigant’s “filings as a whole before dismissing a complaint”
explaining that “whether or not the government’s policy explanations are reasonable under the [APA] is a merits question, not a question of the court’s jurisdiction”
explaining that “whether or not the government’s policy explanations are reasonable under the [APA] is a merits question, not a question of the court’s jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Wilkins, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.