Aaron Schnitzler v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court shall “construe a pro se plaintiff’s filings liberally, and . . . consider his filings as a whole before dismissing a complaint[.]”
• holding a plaintiff’s “claim is not moot” where “he has not received all the 13 relief he sought”
• stating that district courts have an “obligation to construe a pro se plaintiff’s filings liberally”
• noting that courts may consider a pro se litigant’s “filings as a whole before dismissing a complaint”
• explaining that “whether or not the government’s policy explanations are reasonable under the [APA] is a merits question, not a question of the court’s jurisdiction”
• explaining that “whether or not the government’s policy explanations are reasonable under the [APA] is a merits question, not a question of the court’s jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).