Aaron Pantoja Gonzalez v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that Revised Subchapter H is unconstitutional and affirming the judgment of sentence where the appellant had “presented no evidence, whatsoever” to meet his burden
• upholding Wolf’s registration requirements, despite his argument that Revised Subchapter H is punitive.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).