Aaron McCoy v. Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a tortious interference with expectancy claim failed without allegedly improper conduct directed to the third party
• recognizing that “[d]ifferent causes of action between the same parties that arise from the same contract and same events will ordinarily be part of the same case or controversy”
• noting that a choice-of-law argument may be waived if a party fails to raise it
• stating that in the absence of a choice-of-law issue, “the federal court may simply apply the forum state’s substantive law”
• explaining that a “loose factual connection” between claims is generally enough to find them part of the same case or controversy
• affirming the denial of a motion to amend brought at a late stage that introduced new theories of liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).