Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction
• suggesting that the FTCA exhaustion requirement remains jurisdictional even in the wake of Fort Bend County v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 1843 (2019)
• noting that complaint included only “a boilerplate recitation, unaccompanied by any factual detail”
• “What matters is whether the underlying activity itself was part of the 6 employee’s duties.”
• “Extensive precedent makes clear that alleging a federal employee violated policy or even laws in the course of her employment . . . does not take that conduct outside the scope of employment.”
• 2d Am. Compl. ¶ 144

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).