Skip to main content

Aaron J. Connell v. Emily J. Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Counsel only pursued this sentence-focused strategy after discussing it with Hightower and gaining his approval.”
  • “Counsel testified . . . that their strategy was to save Hightower’s life, rather than to seek an acquittal. This was a reasonable strategic choice, given that Hightower confessed to the murders . . . .”
  • “We recently decided in Hicks . . . that Ake errors are subject to harmless Netherland, 79 F.3d 1386, 1388 (4th Cir. 1996); Brewer v. Reynolds, 51 F.3d 1519, 1529 (10th Cir. 1995); Starr v. Lockhart, 23 F.3d 1280, 1291 (8th Cir. 1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.