Aaron Fleck v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., and E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defamation claim based upon statement that broker was “basically a criminal” was subject to arbitration
• holding that defamation claim based upon statement that broker was ″basically a criminal″ was subject [* ] to arbitration
• adopting “the test that the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit developed in Morgan”
• reversing district court’s denial of motion to compel arbitration, court remanded with instructions to order arbitration for all claims that involve employment relationship; plaintiff had signed Form U-4
• defamation governed by employment arbitration rule if rule’s language “would lead a reasonable applicant to expect arbitration of claims such as these”
• statements made that employee was “basically a criminal” and had been fired for cause held arbitrable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).