Skip to main content
· 8/11/2022

A.A.O. v. A.M.O.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2767

Syllabus

Divorce R.C. 3105.171(B) separate property marital property abuse of discretion reasonable equitable allocation of parental rights and responsibilities R.C. 3109.04 child support spousal support R.C. 3105.18 attorney fees. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the $75,000 down payment for the marital home came from Husband's premarital account and Husband's parents and therefore constituted Husband's separate property. The trial court did not otherwise abuse its discretion in its division of marital property, allocation of parental rights and responsibilities, spousal support order, or denial of Wife's request for attorney fees. While the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in finding Wife voluntarily unemployed and imputing income to her for purposes of its child support calculation, the trial court erred in using an incorrect amount of spousal support when computing Wife's gross income on its child support computation worksheet.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.