Skip to main content
· 10/10/1990

Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.

Citations

  • 224 Cal. App. 3d 674
  • 274 Cal. Rptr. 81
  • 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1443
  • 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1072
  • 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,575
  • 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 125
  • 1990 WL 151790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a terminated employee’s claim of intentional interference with contract against a supervisor was barred by the manager’s privilege
  • “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiffs cause of action....”
  • “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiffs cause of action....”
  • “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiff's cause of action”
  • “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiff's cause of action”
  • describing California appellate decisions as a “knot of authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sparks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.