· 10/10/1990
Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.
Citations
- 224 Cal. App. 3d 674
- 274 Cal. Rptr. 81
- 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1443
- 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1072
- 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,575
- 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 125
- 1990 WL 151790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a terminated employee’s claim of intentional interference with contract against a supervisor was barred by the manager’s privilege
- “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiffs cause of action....”
- “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiffs cause of action....”
- “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiff's cause of action”
- “privilege, is an affirmative defense, not an element of plaintiff's cause of action”
- describing California appellate decisions as a “knot of authority”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sparks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.