A. W. Barkley Used Cars, Inc. v. Fiada Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s allegation that the sentencing court failed to take into account his rehabilitative needs entitled him to no relief
• holding that the appellant’s allegation that the sentencing court failed to take into account his rehabilitative needs entitled him to no relief
• holding that that challenges to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the time of sentencing or in a motion to modify the sentence
• recognizing that the appellant’s argument “goes to the credibility of the witness’s testimony, and is, therefore, not an attack on the sufficiency of the evidence, but an allegation regarding the weight it should have been afforded”
• holding objections to discretionary aspects of sentence waived if not raised at the sentencing hearing or in a timely filed post-sentence motion
• finding that defendant’s claim that his sentence failed to take into account his rehabilitative needs did not raise a substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).