Skip to main content
· 10/19/2023

A. v. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that restrictions upon an individual's access to the Internet necessarily curtail First Amendment rights
  • recognizing that appellate review of the grant of a preliminary injunction under the abuse of discretion standard is limited and deferential
  • concluding that the district court’s determination as to likelihood of success “was not an abuse of discretion”
  • concluding that district court’s determination as to likelihood of success “was not an abuse of discretion”
  • concluding that the dis- trict court’s determination as to likelihood of success “was not an abuse of discretion”
  • concluding that the dis- trict court’s determination as to likelihood of success “was not an abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.