A. Turner & T. Govan-Turner v. Lower Merion S.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that testimony of a cooperating accomplice can be sufficient to sustain a conviction, even if uncorroborated
• noting that “We do not consider new evidence produced on appeal.”
• noting that “We do not consider new evidence produced on appeal.”
• explaining that \[w]e repeatedly have held that\ even \'the uncorroborated testimony of a cooperating accomplice may sustain a conviction so long as that testimony is not facially incredible'\ (quoting United States v. Torres–Galindo, 206 F.3d 136, 140 (1st Cir. 2000))
• holding that planting drugs constitutes distribution
• looking at the \evidence[] taken as a whole and in the light most favorable to the prosecution\ (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).