A. S, Mother of I. T.S. and F. S. K. Minor Children v. Florida Department of Children and Families

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Davis challenge is futile when the crime for which the defendant was convicted satisfies the section 924(c)(3)(A) elements clause
• holding that armed robbery of a credit union under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d) qualifies as a “crime of violence” under § 924(c)’s elements clause
• indicating that a Davis challenge is futile when the crime for which the defendant was convicted also satisfies the § 924(c)(3)(A) elements clause
• noting that a defendant cannot show a reasonable likelihood of benefitting from Davis where the predicate offense qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause
• “If the companion crime for which an applicant was convicted qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)’s use-of-force clause, that applicant cannot show that there is a “reasonable likelihood” that he will benefit from the rule announced in Davis.”
• “If the companion crime for which an applicant was convicted qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)’s use-of-force clause, that applicant cannot show that there is a ‘reasonable likelihood’ that he will benefit from the rule announced in Davis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).