Skip to main content
· 4/10/1968

A. R. Lantz Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 283 F. Supp. 164
  • 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1277
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring a discovery response to include information under the control of a party’s attorneys, agents, representatives or others acting on his or her behalf
  • “A party cannot refuse to answer interrogatories merely on the ground that the information sought is solely within the knowledge of his attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.