Skip to main content
· 3/21/1988

A & P Tea Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 539 A.2d 51
  • 114 Pa. Commw. 507
  • 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a Board decision to remand to a different referee because the original referee had been reassigned to another county
  • remand to WCJ is proper if factual issues remain on appeal that need to be clarified or resolved
  • referee substitution upon remand due to referee reassignment to another county
  • referee substitution upon remand due to referee reassignment to another county
  • remand proper under similar circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Palladino, Kalish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.