District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/9/1994
A Mortg. Co. v. Bowman
Citations
- 642 So. 2d 123
- 1994 WL 486561
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “By refusing to enter an order rescheduling sale, the trial court abused its discretion.”
- “With respect to the cancellation and rescheduling of foreclosure sales, absent extraordinary circumstances, a mortgagee has the right to proceed to sale on any property on which it has successfully foreclosed its mortgage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-21· cited 17×
- Bankers Trust Co. v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-21· cited 5×
- Chemical Mortgage Co. v. DicksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-15· cited 2×
- Margaretten & Co. v. LandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-15
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- First Nationwide Savings v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-10-14· cited 8×
- Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America v. FrankhouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-08· cited 6×
- ADMIN. OF VETERAN'S AFFAIRS v. BertscheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-20· cited 5×
- Source One Mortgage Services Corp. v. StewartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.