Skip to main content
· 1/31/1983

A-Larms, Inc. v. Alarms Device Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 300 S.E.2d 311
  • 165 Ga. App. 382
  • 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 99
  • 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 1879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]onsequential damages may be excluded or limited unless such would be unconscionable, and such limitation of damages where the loss is commercial is not prima facie unconscionable.”
  • limited warranty only referred to in catalog but available upon request was conspicuous
  • buyer’s ignorance of warranty terms not excused by failure to request or examine document made available through catalog offer to provide copy of the written, limited warranty upon request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deen, Banke, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.