A & H Sportswear Co., Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• at bench trial, rejecting calculation of profits using full absorption method because the volume of sales of infringing product as a percentage of total sales was insignificant
• “This Circuit has consistently held that state common law claims of unfair competition and actions pursuant to California Business and Professions Code § 17200 are ‘substantially congruent’ to claims made under the Lanham Act.”
• Compared to a broader injunction, “relief in the form of a disclaimer is the more likely candidate Page 5 of 15 for correcting any consumer misperceptions as to the source of the parties’ products and repairing damage to Plaintiffs’ reputation and goodwill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).