A. F. T. Corp. v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under an earlier — and also materially identical — predecessor to OCGA § 9-3-3, the defense of laches was “available to the defendant only, and [could] not be employed by the complainant in an equitable proceeding to enjoin the enforcement of a purely legal right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).