Skip to main content
· 6/24/2020

A& E Bail Bonds v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that evidence of one prior incident was admissible to demonstrate a common scheme or plan
  • stating that the potential for prejudice from prior misconduct evidence is at its highest in sexual abuse cases
  • where past acts evidence that bolstered witness’ credibility and impugned defendant’s credibility was inadmissible for a proper ER 404(b) purpose, its admission was not harmless
  • under nonconstitutional harmless error standard, “the question is whether within reasonable probabilities, the outcome of the trial would have been materially affected had the error not occurred”
  • not abuse of discretion to admit evidence that defendant had, “in what would be perceived as grandfatherly behavior,” invited both victims to sit with him in his recliner
  • not abuse of discretion to admit evidence that defendant had, “in what would be perceived as grandfatherly behavior,” invited both victims to sit with him in his recliner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz C.J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.