Skip to main content
· 7/9/1912

A. D. Howe Mach. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.

Citations

  • 197 F. 541
  • 117 C.C.A. 37
  • 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1313

Syllabus

<p>1. Patents (§ 141*) — Reissue—Broadening or Claims.</p> <p>While a reissue may not claim an invention not clearly shown in the original patent, a reissue is not necessarily void because its claims are broader than those of the original.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. §§ 206-213; Dec. Dig. § 141.*]</p> <p>2. Patents (§ 138*) — Validity op Reissue — Laches.</p> <p>A delay of 7% months before applying for a reissue is not of itself fatal to the reissue if rights of others have not intervened.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. §§ 201-203; Dee. Dig. § 138.*]</p> <p>3. Patents (§ 328*) — Validity and Infringement — Water Motor.</p> <p>The Cofiield reissue patent, No. 12,719 (original No. 807,779), for a water motor, is within the scope of the original patent, was not anticipated, and discloses novelty and invention, being a pioneer in a limited field, and in such field entitled to a liberal construction; also, held infringed.</p> <p>4. Patents (§ 173*) — Construction—Pioneer Patents.</p> <p>A patent may be a pioneer in a wide field or in a narrow one.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. § 248; Dee. Dig. § 173.*]</p>

Judges: Goff, Pritchard, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.