$99 Down Payment, Inc. v. Garard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding the case after the court violated its duty and proceeded sua sponte to deny the arbitration award in contradiction to the statutory language mandating that the district court “shall confirm” the arbitration award
• “To allow courts to ‘second guess’ an arbitrator by granting a broad scope of judicial review would nullify the very advantages of arbitration.”
• “Our law also indulges every reasonable presumption in favor of the legality of an arbitration award. Consequently, judicial involvement in arbitration is very limited.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).