Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding wrongdoer was an authorized representative because it had authority to submit tax records on the insureds’ behalf and “to possess and disburse the funds” of the insureds
• stating that federal courts apply state law when interpreting insurance policies in diversity actions
• construing \the 'authorized representative' language ... narrowly since it is in an exclusion clause\ and agreeing with Stop & Shop
• \There would be no force or effect to the exclusionary clause if the term 'authorized representative' did not include employees and officers of the authorized company.\
• interpreting same policy as Stop & Shop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).