98 Gates Ave. Corp. v. Bryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a court is generally precluded from 13 reconsidering an issue that has already been decided by the same court, or a higher court 14 in the identical case”
• referring to an \intervening change in the law” as opposed to an \intervening change in controlling authority”
• referring to an \intervening change in the law\ as opposed to an \intervening change in controlling authority\
• explaining that the law of the case is also ordinarily binding on lower courts
• stating that we review attorney’s fee awards for abuse of discretion; “[i]f the district court makes an error of law” in this context, we “will reverse the judgment under the abuse of discretion standard”
• suggesting, in dicta, that the \level or levels of the court or courts involved\ has some bearing on a court's discretion to deviate from law of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).