Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court must draw 9 reasonable inferences from the complaint in reviewing a motion to dismiss
• noting that although a court must assume the truth of all well-pleaded factual allegations, \unwarranted inferences are not sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss.\
• “[C]on-clusory allegations of law and unwarranted inferences are not sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss.”
• “conclusory allegations of law and unwarranted inferences are not sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss”
• “conclusory allegations of law and 17 unwarranted inferences are not sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss.”
• “[C]onclusory 22 allegations of law and unwarranted inferences are not sufficient to defeat a motion to 23 dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).