Skip to main content
· 2/10/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 106 F.3d 904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that finding that “a plan is 2 an ERISA plan is a finding of fact,” which meant that collateral estoppel could be applied 3 to prior finding that a plan was not an ERISA plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.