Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a party that presents no argument in support of its claim 18 waives the argument
• holding a party that presents no case law or argument 17 in support of its claim waives the argument
• holding a party that presents no case law or argument in support of its claim waives the argument
• finding a subpoena was appropriate because the party failed to provide specific support for its assertions that the requests were overbroad or a ‘fishing expedition’
• requiring the 22 responding party to “enunciate” how the subpoenas constitute an improper “fishing expedition” and rejecting such argument presented without “additional support” for that position
• upholding an administra- tive subpoena that required production of over one million documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).