Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not err in considering supplemental evidence when it “permitted both sides to submit supplemental 7 evidence”
• “Because the relief sought is essentially the same, in the form of mandamus, 5 we elect to analyze [Plaintiff’s] entitlement to relief under the APA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).