Skip to main content
· 1/23/1997

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 513, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 835 Mary Ann Carlo v. City of Chino, and Officer Hector Guerra

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 493
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 835
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 513
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1162
  • 1997 WL 22720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a California statute created a liberty interest in an arrestee’s right to make phone calls
  • noting that “Sandin arose in the context of disciplinary segregation of a convicted prisoner”
  • recognizing California allows arrestees to make telephone calls within three 8 || hours of arrest, including to a bail bondsman; holding that the denial of those calls 9 || “involves a substantial liberty interest’
  • California statute created liberty interest in \mandatory\ three phone calls, and interest was protected by procedural due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Boochever, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.