Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where a party has appealed “from the specific grant of a request for an injunction,” “Carson is simply irrelevant, and we have jurisdiction over the [party’s] appeal under § 1292 even though the [party] has not alleged irreparable harm”
• affirming use of class-based action and stating how case would look at use of race in all applications for promotions
• affirming use of class-based action and stating how case would look at use of race in all applications for promotions
• the Ninth Circuit’s jurisdiction 1 under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), which permits appeals from orders regarding preliminary 2 injunctions, “extends only to the matters inextricably bound up with the injunctive order from 3 which the appeal is taken.” (cleaned up)
• instructing courts to review the administrative agency complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).