· 8/22/1996
Federal Case
Citations
- 94 F.3d 539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing nonparty to appeal injunction despite plaintiffs’ assur- ances that they would not seek contempt against the nonparty
- finding standing for nonparty where injunction confronted nonparty “with the choice of either conforming its conduct to the dictates of the injunction or ignoring the injunction and risking contempt proceedings”
- finding standing for nonparty where injunction confronted nonparty “with the choice of either conforming its conduct to the dictates of the injunction or ignoring the injunction and risking contempt proceedings”
- “[W]here a permanent injunction has been granted that supersedes the original preliminary injunction, the interlocutory injunction becomes merged in the final decree . . . .” (citation and quotations omitted) (emphasis added)
- district court must have personal 6 jurisdiction to enforce an injunction against an entity
- “[W]here a permanent injunction has been granted that supersedes the original preliminary injunction, the interlocutory injunction becomes merged in the final decree . . . .” (citation and quotations omitted) (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.