Skip to main content
· 8/22/1996

Federal Case

Citations

  • 94 F.3d 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing nonparty to appeal injunction despite plaintiffs’ assur- ances that they would not seek contempt against the nonparty
  • finding standing for nonparty where injunction confronted nonparty “with the choice of either conforming its conduct to the dictates of the injunction or ignoring the injunction and risking contempt proceedings”
  • finding standing for nonparty where injunction confronted nonparty “with the choice of either conforming its conduct to the dictates of the injunction or ignoring the injunction and risking contempt proceedings”
  • “[W]here a permanent injunction has been granted that supersedes the original preliminary injunction, the interlocutory injunction becomes merged in the final decree . . . .” (citation and quotations omitted) (emphasis added)
  • district court must have personal 6 jurisdiction to enforce an injunction against an entity
  • “[W]here a permanent injunction has been granted that supersedes the original preliminary injunction, the interlocutory injunction becomes merged in the final decree . . . .” (citation and quotations omitted) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.