Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court did not err in denying leave to amend because the plaintiff acknowledged that the claim was similar to claims previously asserted
• upholding the denial of leave to amend where the proposed amendments 7 would be redundant
• “futility and prior amendment” support 15 || denial of leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).