Skip to main content
· 5/24/1996

Federal Case

Citations

  • 84 F.3d 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding relator’s knowledge was “secondhand” because it came from a defendant’s employee “who had firsthand knowledge of the alleged fraud as a result of his employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.