95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6657, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,397 United States of America v. Young Ho Kim, United States of America v. Jeong Suk Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “knowledge of the unlawful purpose of the conspiracy does not instruct the jury to explicitly find knowledge of” an essential element of the offense
• reversing conviction for conspiracy to structure where the jury was not instructed to find that the defendant had knowledge of the illegality of structuring
• where prosecution \had no reason to introduce . . . evidence\ of element under circuit law at time of trial, sufficiency of evidence as to that element not examined
• appellate court should not \examine the sufficiency of evidence of an element that the [g]overnment was not required to prove under the law . . . at the time of trial because the [g]overnment had no reason to introduce such evidence in the first place\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).