Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[d]efense costs are .. covered by a D & 0 policy if they are reasonably related to the defense of the insured directors and officers, even though they may also have been useful in defense of the uninsured corporation.”
• “the settlement costs were an actual out-of-pocket loss to Safeway incurred in defense of its directors and officers”
• “Safeway also argues that allocation of its defense costs was ■improper, since all those costs were related to defense of the officers and directors.”
• “It is logical to conclude that in a situation covered by subsection (d
• “Defense costs are thus covered by a [Directors and Officers Liability] policy if they are reasonably related to the defense of the insured directors and officers, even though they may also have been useful in defense of the uninsured corporation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).