902 Carp Loveland, L.L.C. v. Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming “dismissal with prejudice because” defendant was “entitled to qualified immunity on the claim for damages”
• affirming “dismissal with prejudice because” defendant was “entitled to qualified immunity on the claim for damages”
• affirming “dismissal with prejudice” because defendant was “entitled to qualified immunity on the claims for damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).