801 Skinker Boulevard Corp. v. Director of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the claimant and expert testimony found credible by the commission was competent and substantial evidence of total disability arising from a workplace accident
• affirming an award for future medical treatment that included pain management because the Commission believed claimant’s medical expert who recom-. mended future care
• “This Court must defer to the [c]ommission’s findings on … the weight given to conflicting evidence[.]”
• future medical treatment for pain provided by section 247.140.1 even if claimant had reached MMI with respect to his injury
• “This Court is not bound by the commission’s interpretation and application of the law, and no deference is afforded to those determinations.” (citing Gervich v. Condaire, Inc., 370 S.W.3d 617, 620 (Mo. banc 2012))
• “Employability is a matter within the Commission’s expertise....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).