8000 Greenwell Springs Road, L.L.C. v. Dixie Warehousing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that res judicata depends on lack of need for further action by court to determine matter
• \[i]mplicit in our decisions that have discussed the retroactive application of judgments is the presumption that retroactivity is limited to pending cases\
• “[(Implicit in our decisions that have discussed the retroactive application of judgments is the presumption that retroactivity is limited to pending cases”
• under general rule, judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application presumed to apply retroactively to pending cases
• “judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively”
• ‘judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).