· 1/21/1999
Federal Case
Citations
- 165 F.3d 244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that courts have an obligation to construe pro se pleadings liberally and “apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether a pro se litigant has mentioned it by name”
- explaining that when a Court is presented with a pro se submission, the Court must “apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether a pro se litigant has mentioned it by name”
- stating that courts have an obligation to liberally construe pro se pleadings
- stating that courts have an obligation to liberally construe pro se pleadings
- stating that courts have an obligation to liberally construe pro se pleadings
- “We apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether a pro se litigant has mentioned it by name.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.