Skip to main content
· 1/21/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 165 F.3d 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts have an obligation to construe pro se pleadings liberally and “apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether a pro se litigant has mentioned it by name”
  • explaining that when a Court is presented with a pro se submission, the Court must “apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether a pro se litigant has mentioned it by name”
  • stating that courts have an obligation to liberally construe pro se pleadings
  • stating that courts have an obligation to liberally construe pro se pleadings
  • stating that courts have an obligation to liberally construe pro se pleadings
  • “We apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether a pro se litigant has mentioned it by name.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.