Skip to main content
· 5/4/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 175 F.3d 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Casting doubt on an employer's asserted reasons for an adverse employment action does not require judgment for the plaintiff, but it permits a reasonable jury to infer that the employer acted with the forbidden animus[.]”
  • statement that female plaintiff was not promoted because successful rival “was a married man with a wife and children to support”
  • “[A]n employee need not prove the underlying claim of discrimination in order to establish a retaliation claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.